Explore the accounts, documents and research behind UFOs and UAP.
We add newly reviewed sources as they are ready. Not all of our research is public yet.
381 sources so far
NASA’s proceedings document a public propulsion workshop and list Puthoff and Eric Davis contributions. The supplied front matter changes the preliminary report’s participant breakdown and task count, while the cover and foreword disagree on the workshop year. Most of the volume remains unread.
Selected proceedings front matterDavis proposes wormhole propulsion while rejecting a claimed magnetic wormhole solution as a hypercylinder. He cites private technical communications, acknowledges colleagues and reports partial NIDS support. The proposed physics and contacts do not establish an achieved device, classified UAP briefing or recovered hardware.
Supplied paper images and text; fidelity gapsPete Willsher recalls questioning by military personnel and a colonel showing photographs; separate stories describe Edwin’s alleged police encounter and reported Air Force transport for Elizabeth Klarer. The issue also records unresolved witness follow-ups, ordinary explanations and disputed book claims. Each account retains its speaker, relay chain and missing originals.
Complete supplied issue text; seven native layoutsThe issue describes a police pilot’s reported Air Force questionnaire visit, conflicting radar accounts and Venus, autokinesis or drone alternatives. Witness follow-ups and Corso commentary retain their relay chains, missing originals and contrary interpretations. The magazine reports these claims; it does not establish a secret programme, alien technology or medical causation.
Complete supplied issue text; six native layoutsMaterial-sample reports from ten cases are assessed through recovery context, custody and laboratory limitations.
Supplied paper readReported brightness and distance underpin conditional optical-power estimates for six cases.
Supplied text and apparatus reviewedHind records witness follow-ups, ordinary explanations and negative site findings, while distinguishing her own conference attendance from relayed stories. A proposed research invitation was not taken up. Medical claims, government-interest arguments and reader opinions retain their missing originals and source dependencies.
Complete supplied issue text; selected illustrationsNASA’s preliminary report documents an invitation-only 1997 propulsion workshop, including Puthoff’s invited presentation and Davis’s listed poster. It preserves skeptical views, inconclusive measurements and unresolved physics. Proposed research, funding and future collaboration are distinguished from achieved technology or classified UAP access.
Complete supplied preliminary report; all figuresThe July 1997 issue preserves military debriefing accounts with uncertain dates and missing originals, including an unnamed soldier’s story that Hind questions on chronological grounds. It corrects Ian McPhee’s alleged presence in an earlier Kitwe report and records negative site checks and natural alternatives for other reports.
Complete supplied issue text; selected illustrationsThe January 1997 issue preserves a layered Varginha report, a doctor’s denial and an explicitly uncertain story about alleged secret Mars photographs. Cammack later qualifies her memory of Howe’s remarks. Hind also discusses disputed media coverage, witness interpretations and missing original records.
Complete supplied issue text; selected figuresThe issue completes two earlier article series while retaining conflicting film-provenance claims and questioned documents. Hind recounts Noyes saying that he passed UFO reports to a senior but received no feedback. The recipient and underlying records remain unknown.
Complete supplied issue text; paired articles readThe issue corrects earlier dates, route, investigator credit and a physical-effect report. Conference notes retain Howe’s explicitly uncorroborated anonymous-source claims. A separate account alleges police and possible military contact after a sighting, with original records absent.
Complete supplied issue text; corrections checkedA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach