A clearer view of the evidence.

Explore the accounts, documents and research behind UFOs and UAP.

We add newly reviewed sources as they are ready. Not all of our research is public yet.

Recently reviewed

381 sources so far

Browse by type →
BookS330

UFO Briefing Document: The Best Available Evidence

Don Berliner, Marie Galbraith, Antonio Huneeus. openminds.tv. December 1995.

This advocacy compilation collects case histories, reproduced illustrations, scientific opinions and reported government interactions. Review preserves missing originals, weather and instrument alternatives, negative corroboration, denied access and personal versus official positions. Reported briefings and funding allegations remain attributed testimony or interpretation. Caption, date and footnote conflicts remain unresolved. The compilation does not independently authenticate extraordinary causes, samples, programmes or custody.

Accepted supplied text; all 148 received native layouts viewed with original-edition gaps
ArticleS7649

UFO Afrinews No12 (July1995) — Ariel follow-up and attributed official-visit reports

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. July 1995.

Hind’s follow-up preserves differing Ariel accounts, reported insignificant soil anomalies and alternative interpretations. A separate1957 Air Force visit account appears in an explicitly unchecked collection. Alleged military-film provenance is relayed, with originals absent.

Complete supplied issue text; diagrams checked
BookS7440

Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens — supplied edition review

John E.Mack. johnemackinstitute.org. May 1995.

Mack’s book presents participant accounts and his interpretations. Supplied text and selected native layouts preserve personal introductions, testimony and original-edition gaps; this reading establishes no abduction mechanism or clinical causation.

Supplied text and all received 1994 native layouts reviewed; missing text retained
ArticleS7648

UFO Afrinews No11 (February1995) — original issue with Ariel and regional reports

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. February 1995.

Hind’s February1995 newsletter reports Ariel, regional sightings and Mack’s visit, including differing witness descriptions and alternative explanations. An older military-film account is relayed through another journal. Its Ariel section overlaps material already reviewed.

Complete supplied issue text; diagrams checked
PaperS7779

Meteorite falls in China and some related human casualty events

Kevin Yau, Paul Weissman, Donald Yeomans. articles.adsabs.harvard.edu. November 1994.

Yau, Weissman and Yeomans examine historical Chinese meteorite reports and disputed casualty accounts. Their concluding discussion attributes apparent frequency changes to reporting biases. They cannot verify the historical casualty claims; statistical and flux comparisons depend on assumptions that this project has not tested.

Complete supplied eight-page article and native layouts read
ArticleS7669

UFO Afrinews No10 (August 1994) — informal CIA lectures and editorial retractions

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. August 1994.

Hind relays a newsletter account of Bruce Maccabee giving informal UFO lectures to CIA employees; dates and original lecture records are absent. She retracts two earlier tabloid tales as fabrications. Budden and Hind continue debating natural explanations and investigation gaps. Witness follow-ups retain unsuccessful contacts, missing artifacts, retrospective recall and ordinary alternatives. A small reader-belief table is recorded with a correction from the scanned page.

Complete supplied issue text; thirteen native layouts
ArticleS7668

UFO Afrinews No9 (February 1994) — unanswered official follow-up and competing interpretations

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. February 1994.

Hind describes a brief call to an air-force pilot whose promised written account never arrived, alongside television reporting of CSIR responses. Witness accounts retain missing follow-ups, memory elicitation and ordinary alternatives. Budden proposes natural explanations for earlier reports; Hind accepts a possible click explanation while disputing his account of the following light. She distinguishes allegedly false Kalahari documents from a conclusion about the underlying event.

Complete supplied issue text; fifteen native layouts
ArticleS7667

UFO Afrinews No8 (September 1993) — follow-up testimony and competing explanations

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. September 1993.

Hind follows earlier witness accounts while retaining missing material and competing assessments. A promised paper could not be found, a farm inspection found no crop changes, and she rejects a UFO connection for the Namibian flame report. Anonymous security-officer and unnamed VIP claims reach readers through Hopkins and magazine reporting; their official identities and recordings remain unverified. The conclusion criticizes leading questions and discusses ordinary sky phenomena.

Complete supplied issue text; ten native layouts
TestimonyS7443

Roswell Testimony — dependent compilation

Christopher Schmidt, compiler. avalonlibrary.net. January 14, 1993.

Schmidt compiles Roswell recollections, mostly attributed to Friedman and Berliner’s Crash at Corona. Review separates personal observations, family and anonymous relays, editorial brackets and later interpretation. Threat, shipment and material accounts retain missing originals and contrary details. Conflicting body counts, uncertain identities and material descriptions remain unresolved. Multiple Henderson sections share one underlying informant. This dependent compilation does not independently authenticate a crash, extraordinary materials or government custody.

Supplied compilation text and all 57 received layouts; original book and interviews absent
ArticleS7666

UFO Afrinews No7 (January 1993) — reported experiences and critical interview review

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. January 1993.

Hind and contributors record witness experiences, competing explanations and advice on preserving interviews. A critical review of Jacobs’s Secret Life questions a uniform abduction model and considers cultural and subjective interpretations. Reported military service and a civilian museum lecture do not establish classified access; a supposed helipad contact failed. Missing recordings, photographs and official records remain explicit.

Complete supplied issue text; nine native layouts

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach