Results

ArticleS7664

UFO Afrinews No21 (January 2000) — contact offers, failed meetings and personal recollections

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. January 2000.

The issue preserves alleged anonymous contact offers to two witnesses, an attended meeting where nobody arrived and a site visit that found no claimed facility. Hind recalls private conversations and a civilian meeting invitation from Hynek. Willsher recounts an uncertain contractor conversation; Wintle critiques missing follow-up in Alien Base. Attributed recollections retain missing originals, contrary observations and an explicitly fictional officer story. No22 publishes witness corrections to the received first-draft account; the original copy remains preserved.

Complete supplied issue text; ten native layouts
ArticleS7672

UFO Afrinews No4 (February 1991) — alleged military assignment and limited soil findings

Cynthia Hind, Maria Sullivan, Prier Wintle. files.afu.se. February 1991.

The issue relays an unnamed Brazilian photographer’s alleged naval assignment through an investigator and Irene Granchi, while Hind questions dates and offers competing explanations. It preserves a counteraccount about a film reportedly examined and returned by the US Air Force. Witness accounts, a language critique and a small soil table retain their limitations. Wintle’s review describes claimed Brazilian military involvement through Vallée’s book, with original orders and records absent.

Complete supplied issue text; fourteen native layouts
ArticleS7673

UFO Afrinews No3 (May 1990) — threatened investigation and untested accounts

Cynthia Hind, Hilary Evans, Prier Wintle. files.afu.se. May 1990.

Hind reports an anonymous threat and an invitation that did not lead to the planned meeting, alongside criticism of the Kalahari crash story. Evans offers several possible explanations for UFO reports. Other accounts include a witness reporting to a commanding officer and Henry’s recollections of technical conversations. Missing records, ordinary alternatives, source corrections and untested claims remain explicit. The supplied book reviews do not substitute for the books.

Complete supplied issue text; twelve native layouts

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach