Rizzo Nervo, Nolan and colleagues model influenza shedding and time since exposure in two controlled challenge datasets. Preinfection baselines and selected healthy cohorts constrain generalization. Several count, legend, validation-method and error-metric descriptions disagree; this is not a UAP-exposure study.
Article, figures and narrative supplements readThe authors compare BioFire and QuickVue tests with a study-specific qPCR comparator in selected influenza-challenge samples. Repeated matched swabs come from143 volunteers, and the two comparisons use different specimen sets. A linked correction changes the rapid-test table denominator from351 to299. These results do not establish performance in community infections, current product versions or UAP research.
Complete supplied main, correction, native tables and offered static figuresThe authors derive a144-gene sex-expression signature from public cohorts and explore age, inferred immune composition and influenza response. Cohort reuse and repeated observations limit independent sample counts. Associations do not establish hormone mechanisms or clinical prediction. A retraction linked inside a cited reference concerns that older paper’s epistasis interpretation; it is not a retraction of this study.
Complete supplied main, tables, meaningful figures and eight supplemental pagesA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach