Explore the accounts, documents and research behind UFOs and UAP.
We add newly reviewed sources as they are ready. Not all of our research is public yet.
381 sources so far
Loeb discusses independent observations and unnamed private-funder conversations. He explicitly says he lacks direct classified and incident-by-incident data. The review preserves that limitation alongside stronger technology-origin assertions, alternative explanations and proposed measurements. Private interest is reported discussion, with no funding commitment or operating-project receipt supplied.
Supplied transcript readLoeb develops his interpretation of interstellar objects, possible technosignatures and future observations, while recounting scientific and academic conversations. Natural alternatives and missing data remain explicit. UAP and ‘Oumuamua are distinguished; no personal classified briefing or government invitation is supplied. Speculative probabilities and policy proposals are not completed tests.
Supplied transcript readREDSEA compensates signal leakage between adjacent segmented cells. Published tests compare correction choices against a fallible manual reference and reused imaging data. Retaining signal and removing ambiguous classifications involve tradeoffs; poor segmentation and several other contamination mechanisms remain unresolved. Source counts, caption panels, equation notation and channel lists conflict. Nolan’s declared instrument-company financial interest and funding disclaimer remain part of the evidence.
Supplied article and published supplements readThis Nolan-coauthored review surveys biomedical virtual and augmented reality and presents illustrative case studies. It retains practical limitations: some training performs worse than hands-on instruction, a surgical comparison found no significant improvement in several broader outcomes, and image quality, tracking, cost, privacy and discomfort constrain use. Demonstrations and reported funding are distinct from proven clinical benefit or classified UAP access.
Complete supplied XML text; original figures and supplements unreviewedThe authors develop a multiplexed imaging panel using eight previously treated tumor specimens. The 25,456 analyzed cells are nested within eight sampled cores, rather than independent patients. Cell types combine clustering with manual refinement; spatial marker patterns do not establish functional causation or clinical treatment prediction. Nolan supervised and revised the study, while Jiang is corresponding author. Channel labels, figure pointers and plotted units remain inconsistent in the supplied source.
Complete supplied text and received apparatus readTabor and Loeb forecast detectability of hypothetical artificial illumination on Proxima b. This is not a detection. The paper acknowledges an estimated instrument noise floor ten times its predicted signal.
Supplied preprint text and native layouts; conditional modelLoeb’s publisher-authorized excerpt presents technological origin for ‘Oumuamua as a hypothesis, acknowledges disagreement and calls for more data. Its trajectory illustration is explanatory rather than a new measurement. Historical advisory roles are self-description; the excerpt contains no classified-briefing or recovered-material account.
Edited book excerpt readLoeb recalls Yuri Milner asking him to assess a nearest-star mission in May2015. This adds dates and setting to the same private-funder account in AfterOn40, without independent corroboration. Natural alternatives and uncertain artificial origin remain explicit. No government or classified-programme invitation is stated.
Complete supplied producer transcript read; original contact records missingThe second profile relays claimed Senate and Defence Department briefing requests and an Army collaboration. It preserves Wilson’s denial of the alleged2002 meeting, disputed material provenance and unsuccessful earlier tests. These recurring accounts do not independently authenticate a memo, retrieval programme or anomalous material.
Complete supplied public text; original records missingThis profile relays private NIDS invitations and recurring Davis, Puthoff and Bigelow accounts. It also reports declining activity and payroll reductions, and offers a small pool of willing researchers as an explanation for repeated collaborators. These are dependent reporting accounts, with no newly verified programme access.
Complete supplied public text; images and originals unreviewedWeinstein discusses his proposed theory, academic conflicts, routine science-agency career support and reported policy meetings. This interview supplies scientist background and institutional testimony. No UAP observation, retrieval-programme approach, classified briefing or extraterrestrial-material account appears in the supplied text. Corrections and anonymous interview dependencies are retained.
Supplied transcript readMarden and Friedman describe the Hills’ journey, reported sighting and aftermath through participant and family accounts. Betty’s diary quotes Barney through Marden; advice to contact Pease and try a compass passes through unnamed advisers and relatives. These are distinct from an Air Force approach or a calibrated magnetic test. The preview retains initial ordinary explanations and memory limits.
Supplied public preview readA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach