Results

PaperS103

The New Science of Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena

Kevin H. Knuth, Philippe Ailleris, Hussein Ali Agrama, Eamonn Ansbro, Phyllis A. Budinger, Tejin Cai, Thibaut Canuti, Michael C. Cifone, Walter Bruce Cornet, Jr., Frédéric Courtade, Richard Dolan, Laura Domine, Luc Dini, Baptiste Friscourt, Ryan Graves, Richard F. Haines, Richard Hoffman, Hakan Kayal, Sarah Little, Garry P. Nolan, Robert Powell, Mark Rodeghier, Edoardo Russo, Peter Skafish, Erling Strand, Michael Swords, Matthew Szydagis, Gerald T. Tedesco, John J. Tedesco, Massimo Teodorani, Jacques Vallée, Michaël Vaillant, Beatriz Villarroel, Wesley A. Watters. arxiv.org. 2025.

This coauthored review surveys reported aerospace and undersea phenomena, historical cases and proposed research. Selected figure pages distinguish drawings, photographs, material reports and hypothetical interpretations. Its coauthors and reproduced cases do not supply independent verification of underlying events, anomalous materials or government programmes.

Prior supplied HTML; all 195 retained native layouts viewed
PaperS7570

MAPS: pathologist-level cell type annotation from tissue images through machine learning

Muhammad Shaban, Yunhao Bai, Huaying Qiu, Shulin Mao, Jason Yeung, Yao Yu Yeo, Vignesh Shanmugam, Han Chen, Bokai Zhu, Jason L Weirather, Garry P Nolan, Margaret A Shipp, Scott J Rodig, Sizun Jiang, Faisal Mahmood. ebi.ac.uk. January 2, 2024.

MAPS uses expert-labelled protein-expression data to classify cells. The authors report strong results within datasets, while acknowledging leakage risk from splitting one patient’s CODEX image by cells. Performance falls across cohorts and competing methods sometimes do better. Nolan is a coauthor and supervisor; disclosed commercial interests, reporting differences and missing original materials accompany the findings.

Complete supplied article and supplement text read; original and tiny-label gaps
PaperS7491

Physical Considerations for an Intercept Mission to a 1I/'Oumuamua-like Interstellar Object

Amir Siraj, Abraham Loeb, Amaya Moro-Martin, Mark Elowitz, Abigail White, Wesley A. Watters, Gary J. Melnick, Richard Cloete, Jonathan Grindlay, Frank Laukien. arxiv.org. November 3, 2022.

Siraj, Loeb and colleagues outline requirements for a proposed interstellar-object intercept. Detection and reachability forecasts depend on assumptions; material analogues and modelled spectra do not identify an artificial object.

Preprint text and figures read
PaperS7747

Erosion of Icy Interstellar Objects by Cosmic Rays and Implications for ‘Oumuamua

Vo Hong Minh Phan, Thiem Hoang, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. October 28, 2021.

Phan, Hoang and Loeb model erosion and modification of icy interstellar objects under assumed cosmic-ray, material and travel conditions. Prior observations and fits support theoretical predictions rather than new detections or demonstrated composition.

Complete supplied seven-page manuscript; conditional erosion model
PaperS7750

Destruction of molecular hydrogen ice and Implications for 1I/2017 U1 (`Oumuamua)

Thiem Hoang, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. August 12, 2020.

Hoang and Loeb model destruction and formation of pure hydrogen ice under assumed radiation, material and cloud conditions. They challenge one proposed explanation of Oumuamua while retaining environmental exceptions; no hydrogen object is observed and no artificial origin is established.

Complete supplied eight-page manuscript; conditional hydrogen-ice model
PaperS7625

Multimodal Analysis of Composition and Spatial Architecture in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Andrew L Ji, Adam J Rubin, Kim Thrane, Sizun Jiang, David L Reynolds, Robin M Meyers, Margaret G Guo, Benson M George, Annelie Mollbrink, Joseph Bergenstråhle, Ludvig Larsson, Yunhao Bai, Bokai Zhu, Aparna Bhaduri, Jordan M Meyers, Xavier Rovira-Clavé, S Tyler Hollmig, Sumaira Z Aasi, Garry P Nolan, Joakim Lundeberg, Paul A Khavari. ebi.ac.uk. July 23, 2020.

The authors combine sequencing and imaging to describe selected squamous-cancer tissue, including a tumour-specific keratinocyte population. Cells, spots and fields depend on small patient subsets. Predicted interactions and proximity do not establish causal immune suppression. A linked correction repairs duplicated and mislabeled figure material; its unchanged-conclusions statement is attributed to the authors.

Complete supplied main, correction, S5 cells and S3 signature cells; remaining gaps
PaperS7608

Ultra-high throughput single-cell analysis of proteins and RNAs by split-pool synthesis

Maeve O’Huallachain, Felice-Alessio Bava, Mary Shen, Carolina Dallett, Sri Paladugu, Nikolay Samusik, Simon Yu, Razika Hussein, Grantland R. Hillman, Samuel Higgins, Melanie Lou, Angelica Trejo, Laura Qin, Yu Chuan Tai, Shigemi M. Kinoshita, Astraea Jager, Deval Lashkari, Yury Goltsev, Sedide Ozturk, Garry P. Nolan. ebi.ac.uk. May 7, 2020.

The authors demonstrate split-pool barcoding for protein and targeted RNA measurements in cell lines, human blood-cell material and mouse cells. Large theoretical barcode capacity is distinct from measured event recovery. Uneven RNA detection, cell losses, exclusions, doublets and source discrepancies limit interpretation; no clinical or UAP validation follows.

Complete supplied main and correction text; partial supplemental visuals
PaperS7724

The 2019 Discovery of a Meteor of Interstellar Origin

Amir Siraj, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. April 15, 2019.

Siraj and Loeb infer an interstellar meteor trajectory from catalogue inputs and an assumed error model. The paper attributes uncertainty information to Heavner and quotes a reported DoD statement, with Worden, Daniels, Shaw, Mozer, an anonymous analyst and Hurd credited for distinct clarification roles. Original correspondence and classified data were not received. Conditional confidence, ordinary bound comparators, population assumptions and mass-budget tension remain. Government review does not establish researcher classified access, artificial origin or recovered material.

Received preprint text and native layouts; original data and contact gaps

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach