Results

ArticleS7650

UFO Afrinews No13 (February1996) — corrections and attributed conference/official-contact accounts

Cynthia Hind, Diana Cammack. files.afu.se. February 1996.

The issue corrects earlier dates, route, investigator credit and a physical-effect report. Conference notes retain Howe’s explicitly uncorroborated anonymous-source claims. A separate account alleges police and possible military contact after a sighting, with original records absent.

Complete supplied issue text; corrections checked
ArticleS7689

Correction and Apology — written Dolan post and author reply

Richard Dolan. richarddolanmembers.com. September 16, 2026.

Dolan publishes a correction and reports professional contact from Jennice Vilhauer. The written post and site-labelled author reply belong to the existing video-correction family; they provide no independent government-contact or programme evidence.

Complete supplied written post and author reply; related originals retain separate scopes
ArticleS7656

UFO Afrinews No16 (July 1997) — military accounts and Kitwe correction

Cynthia Hind, Roland Roeis. files.afu.se. July 1997.

The July 1997 issue preserves military debriefing accounts with uncertain dates and missing originals, including an unnamed soldier’s story that Hind questions on chronological grounds. It corrects Ian McPhee’s alleged presence in an earlier Kitwe report and records negative site checks and natural alternatives for other reports.

Complete supplied issue text; selected illustrations
ArticleS7655

UFO Afrinews No15 (January 1997) — Varginha relays and later testimony qualifications

Cynthia Hind, Diana Cammack, Roland Roeis, Cynthia Luce. files.afu.se. January 1997.

The January 1997 issue preserves a layered Varginha report, a doctor’s denial and an explicitly uncertain story about alleged secret Mars photographs. Cammack later qualifies her memory of Howe’s remarks. Hind also discusses disputed media coverage, witness interpretations and missing original records.

Complete supplied issue text; selected figures
ArticleS7675

UFO Afrinews No1 (July 1988, first reprint) — official denials and uncertain access

Cynthia Hind, Maria Sullivan, Prier Wintle. files.afu.se. July 1988.

Hind recounts police testimony and contrary laboratory claims at Rosmead, says she has access to unnamed governmental psychologists, and publishes a former consul’s personal sighting account. Proposed cooperation and reported official roles do not establish programme access. Retrospective sleep-related reports, prompted recollections, ordinary alternatives and negative searches remain explicit. The accompanying book review and evolutionary essay are distinct from verified clinical or technical findings.

Complete supplied issue text; fourteen native layouts
ArticleS7664

UFO Afrinews No21 (January 2000) — contact offers, failed meetings and personal recollections

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. January 2000.

The issue preserves alleged anonymous contact offers to two witnesses, an attended meeting where nobody arrived and a site visit that found no claimed facility. Hind recalls private conversations and a civilian meeting invitation from Hynek. Willsher recounts an uncertain contractor conversation; Wintle critiques missing follow-up in Alien Base. Attributed recollections retain missing originals, contrary observations and an explicitly fictional officer story. No22 publishes witness corrections to the received first-draft account; the original copy remains preserved.

Complete supplied issue text; ten native layouts
ArticleS7673

UFO Afrinews No3 (May 1990) — threatened investigation and untested accounts

Cynthia Hind, Hilary Evans, Prier Wintle. files.afu.se. May 1990.

Hind reports an anonymous threat and an invitation that did not lead to the planned meeting, alongside criticism of the Kalahari crash story. Evans offers several possible explanations for UFO reports. Other accounts include a witness reporting to a commanding officer and Henry’s recollections of technical conversations. Missing records, ordinary alternatives, source corrections and untested claims remain explicit. The supplied book reviews do not substitute for the books.

Complete supplied issue text; twelve native layouts

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach