Hind publishes witness corrections to the previous contact story, removing its classified-envelope description and changing a phone message to a pager message. Wintle’s review relays Dodd’s alleged embassy invitation, anonymous military accounts and a warning encounter; promised media never arrived and hoped-for contact failed. The editors reject the disputed Kalahari account. Natural alternatives, contrary testimony and missing originals remain explicit.
The issue preserves alleged anonymous contact offers to two witnesses, an attended meeting where nobody arrived and a site visit that found no claimed facility. Hind recalls private conversations and a civilian meeting invitation from Hynek. Willsher recounts an uncertain contractor conversation; Wintle critiques missing follow-up in Alien Base. Attributed recollections retain missing originals, contrary observations and an explicitly fictional officer story. No22 publishes witness corrections to the received first-draft account; the original copy remains preserved.
■ Complete supplied issue text; ten native layouts
Hind records an unnamed radio caller’s claim of Air Force transport for Klarer, while a book review describes an intelligence offer to Moore that did not deliver promised secrets. The issue preserves failed witness follow-ups, criticism of implant reports, drone alternatives and conflicting historical dates. The reported contacts retain missing originals and uncertain access.
Pete Willsher recalls questioning by military personnel and a colonel showing photographs; separate stories describe Edwin’s alleged police encounter and reported Air Force transport for Elizabeth Klarer. The issue also records unresolved witness follow-ups, ordinary explanations and disputed book claims. Each account retains its speaker, relay chain and missing originals.
The issue describes a police pilot’s reported Air Force questionnaire visit, conflicting radar accounts and Venus, autokinesis or drone alternatives. Witness follow-ups and Corso commentary retain their relay chains, missing originals and contrary interpretations. The magazine reports these claims; it does not establish a secret programme, alien technology or medical causation.
■ Complete supplied issue text; six native layouts
Hind records witness follow-ups, ordinary explanations and negative site findings, while distinguishing her own conference attendance from relayed stories. A proposed research invitation was not taken up. Medical claims, government-interest arguments and reader opinions retain their missing originals and source dependencies.
Cynthia Hind, Roland Roeis. files.afu.se. July 1997.
The July 1997 issue preserves military debriefing accounts with uncertain dates and missing originals, including an unnamed soldier’s story that Hind questions on chronological grounds. It corrects Ian McPhee’s alleged presence in an earlier Kitwe report and records negative site checks and natural alternatives for other reports.
Cynthia Hind, Diana Cammack, Roland Roeis, Cynthia Luce. files.afu.se. January 1997.
The January 1997 issue preserves a layered Varginha report, a doctor’s denial and an explicitly uncertain story about alleged secret Mars photographs. Cammack later qualifies her memory of Howe’s remarks. Hind also discusses disputed media coverage, witness interpretations and missing original records.
Cynthia Hind, Diana Cammack, Roland Roeis. files.afu.se. July 1996.
The issue completes two earlier article series while retaining conflicting film-provenance claims and questioned documents. Hind recounts Noyes saying that he passed UFO reports to a senior but received no feedback. The recipient and underlying records remain unknown.
Cynthia Hind, Diana Cammack. files.afu.se. February 1996.
The issue corrects earlier dates, route, investigator credit and a physical-effect report. Conference notes retain Howe’s explicitly uncorroborated anonymous-source claims. A separate account alleges police and possible military contact after a sighting, with original records absent.
Hind’s follow-up preserves differing Ariel accounts, reported insignificant soil anomalies and alternative interpretations. A separate1957 Air Force visit account appears in an explicitly unchecked collection. Alleged military-film provenance is relayed, with originals absent.
Hind’s February1995 newsletter reports Ariel, regional sightings and Mack’s visit, including differing witness descriptions and alternative explanations. An older military-film account is relayed through another journal. Its Ariel section overlaps material already reviewed.
■ Complete supplied issue text; diagrams checked
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach