Tabor and Loeb forecast detectability of hypothetical artificial illumination on Proxima b. This is not a detection. The paper acknowledges an estimated instrument noise floor ten times its predicted signal.
Supplied preprint text and native layouts; conditional modelLin, Gonzalez Abad and Loeb model whether hypothetical industrial pollutants could be detected in an exoplanet atmosphere. Their exposure forecasts are conditional and supply no detected pollution or civilization.
Supplied preprint text and native layouts; conditional modelSiraj and Loeb combine reported detections and non-detection limits to propose meteor trajectory, spectroscopy and sample tests. The administrator flags substantial text overlap with their earlier meteor paper; IM1 and Oumuamua are reused. The allowed slope range is not a demonstrated confidence interval. Camera coverage, parent-star association, isotopes and sample recovery are forecasts, rather than achieved results. Ordinary alternatives and source discrepancies remain.
Received preprint text and native layouts; overlap and original gapsA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach