Amir Siraj, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. September 20, 2022.
Siraj and Loeb infer unusually high breakup pressures for two reported meteors from catalogue inputs. IM1 reuses the earlier analysis; IM2 remains a candidate whose interstellar origin requires confirmation. Breakup pressure is a model proxy, rather than a laboratory composition measurement. Early weak flaring, corrected light-curve normalization, sensor bias and small-number population assumptions qualify the conclusions. This paper supplies no new government approach or classified-data receipt.
■ Received preprint text and native layouts; original validation gaps
Loeb models a population mass budget for 3I/ATLAS and offers ordinary cometary-core or rarer-population alternatives. Technological design is conditional speculation; albedo, size, selection and reservoir assumptions remain explicit, with no artificial-origin detection or independent model validation.
■ Complete supplied three-page v2 manuscript; model and date gaps retained
Amir Siraj, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. October 5, 2020.
Siraj and Loeb forecast interstellar-object velocity and direction distributions from conventional stellar ejection. Their estimates distinguish 12-object velocity and 180-object angular tests of two ejection models from a separate 12-object anisotropy test. Density, size, sampling and detection assumptions remain uncertain. White-dwarf, outer-cloud and interstellar-medium alternatives are retained. Discovery forecasts and an artifact conjecture are not observations. Manuscript comments and work-level grant support do not establish government access.
■ Received written text and native layouts; originals and interpretation gaps
Amir Siraj, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. February 4, 2019.
Siraj and Loeb model captured interstellar minor-body orbits using inherited density, population and size assumptions. Eight catalogue objects are possible candidates, not confirmed interstellar origins or extraterrestrial artifacts. Native Oort-cloud bodies are an explicit confound. Model convergence and forecasts do not supply independent observations. Native table, selection and population-normalization qualifications remain unresolved; detection bias and original calculation gaps are preserved. Manuscript assistance and work-level funding do not establish government tasking or custody.
■ All six supplied preprint pages and native layouts; candidate and model qualifications
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach