Explore the accounts, documents and research behind UFOs and UAP.
We add newly reviewed sources as they are ready. Not all of our research is public yet.
381 sources so far
Levin reanalyzes a1994clergy pilot about hypothetical disclosure reactions. Low response, missing data and limited representativeness restrict generalization; this partial reading establishes no extraterrestrial contact or actual societal outcome.
Partial supplied survey article; continuation redirectedNested Entropy Sampling searches for informative experiments in synthetic two-dimensional landscapes. Small sample counts can become trapped at local peaks, while higher counts reduce compression. The robot example is a simulation, and reported computation savings count entropy evaluations. Finite successes do not establish global convergence or physical measurement validation.
Complete supplied8-page preprint read; final proceedings and implementation gapsRojas reports a conversation with Grant Cameron and relays historical claims about presidential interest in UFOs. He also acknowledges unknown Obama interest and ordinary political connections; the reported letters, memoir account and public requests do not establish secret programme access.
Complete supplied reporter article; underlying conversation and records incompleteKnuth develops valuation and inference rules on ordered lattices under stated assumptions. This formal methods paper supplies no empirical UAP observations; proof, normalization and later-rendering issues remain explicit.
Complete supplied thirteen-page manuscript; formal inference frameworkMoro-Martín, Turner and Loeb model ordinary interstellar planetesimals using uncertain stellar populations, ejection, size distributions and albedo. Their historical 2009 forecast for inactive objects gives a conditional lifetime expectation of order 0.0001–0.01, described as about a 0.01%–1% chance of one detection. A larger narrow-size scenario is explicitly unsupported by cited constraints. Figures and tables are theoretical scenarios. Survey selection, activity, disruption and survival limit the forecast. No new detection, artificiality or experimental replication is established.
Complete supplied preprint text and all 29 native layouts; notation and original gapsOfficial sample of Dolan’s 2009 volume: front matter, Howe’s foreword and part of Chapter 1 reviewed, with the S072 introduction overlap excluded. Reports and interpretations remain attributed; undelivered promised film and uncorroborated relays are retained. Chapter 1 remains incomplete, and later chapters, endnotes and individual images remain unreviewed under this sample scope.
Official sample reviewed; Chapter 1 incompleteVallée distinguishes interviews, anonymous insider relays and speculative explanations. A reported base visit and Adamski’s alleged request from unnamed scientists do not authenticate secret programmes. Recantations, alibis and ordinary alternatives remain. His human-stratagem and control-system theories retain explicit shortcomings; reported remote-viewing comparisons lack original data. David Swift’s separate epilogue distinguishes influential beliefs from scientific confirmation and notes unexplained who/how questions.
All 272 supplied scan layouts viewed; book coverage remains qualifiedMellon’s historical essay argues for changing government network architecture. He reports discussions with unnamed federal officials and quotes a congressional warning. These are attributed policy and contact accounts, with no UAP programme disclosure or verified current security assessment.
Complete supplied author repost read; original publisher missingStothers compares ancient reported sky phenomena and possible natural explanations. Retrospective accounts and shared written sources require caution; descriptions alone do not authenticate extraterrestrial visitation. The acknowledgment reports a Hynek conversation, library assistance and editorial suggestions. NASA hosting and author affiliation do not establish agency endorsement or government UAP tasking.
Supplied paper text and all 14 page layouts reviewedLoeb and Zaldarriaga forecast searches for accidental radio leakage with then-proposed astronomical observatories. Detectability depends on bandwidth, observing time, beam direction, duty cycle and interference. The figure and table share historical Earth-emission assumptions. Proposed orbital and habitability inferences were not performed measurements. A hypothetical relay-station private communication is attributed but unavailable. The paper reports no extraterrestrial detection; named funding is distinguished by recipient.
All eight supplied preprint pages and native layouts; journal and original-data gapsKelleher and Knapp describe their research and professional access, followed by an author-mediated family wolf account. Kelleher’s unspecified personal observations are separate from that story; his strict-protocol claim is qualified by modified field controls and an own-account disclaimer. Alleged projectile effects and ending tracks lack original measurements and specimen custody. This is another publication in the same ranch/NIDS account family.
Supplied public preview readThe readable supplied narrative and end matter of Ryan Wood’s Majic Eyes Only were already exhausted through the final index. A later reconciliation repaired a stale reading cursor and adds no new reading credit. Garbled or absent reproduced documents, image plates, edition collation and underlying originals prevent whole-book completion. Separate supplements retain their own identities.
Readable supplied text exhausted; reproduced-document gaps remainA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach