Explore the accounts, documents and research behind UFOs and UAP.
We add newly reviewed sources as they are ready. Not all of our research is public yet.
381 sources so far
Fox recounts interviews and named or anonymous contacts concerning military incidents, Varginha and alleged footage. The discussion preserves off-camera limitations, translation, custody chains and corrections about what witnesses actually saw.
Transcript text readLoeb recalls two visitors from Washington reassuring him about his research. He also says he had no classified access and found the available public data unconvincing. The visitors’ identities and knowledge remain unspecified.
Supplied author text readHoang and Loeb argue that evaporative cooling changes a trapped-hydrogen explanation for ’Oumuamua’s acceleration. The critique depends on selected thermal assumptions and does not establish an artificial origin.
Preprint text and figures readLoeb and Laukien outline instrument-based investigations of aerial phenomena, interstellar objects and meteor fragments. The paper describes a research programme and proposed methods, rather than a confirmed anomalous discovery.
Paper text readThis observational ulcerative-colitis atlas describes tissue organization in29patients and five controls. Cells and regions remain nested within individuals. Cross-sectional treatment and sex associations do not establish a resistance mechanism, and19-patient response prediction was unstable and nonsignificant. Nolan is a coauthor with published funding and commercial interests, not a corresponding author. These ordinary scientific attributions supply no classified approach or UAP programme evidence.
Complete root supplied XML text; native apparatus unreviewedBuchanan recounts military remote-viewing work, unnamed corporate and space-related work, an archive request and claimed access to a conventional classified rocket-test area. He says retirement leaves him unaware whether the military programme continues. Remote-viewing interpretations, planned travel and generic private approaches are retained as his accounts, with recipients and records unresolved. Swann is discussed as a methodology source.
Complete bounded publisher dialogue and qualified page layouts; original AV gapsRobert Orr’s FDA presentation publicly describes a 2017 modification of contract HHSF223201610018C and links 75F40120C00176 to a collaboration studying COVID-19 illness in diverse populations. These identifiers match contracts acknowledged for Nolan in MaxFuse. The slides document agency statements about public research funding; they do not name Nolan or establish secret invitations or UAP access.
Partial root native PDF text and selected layout reviewNolan reports an approach by unnamed government agencies and an aerospace firm, medical work and a later government handoff. He distinguishes anecdotal encounters from reproducible evidence and says material analyses shown as government-origin were inadequate. Negative findings and manufacturing alternatives remain alongside these accounts.
Supplied interview text readThis narrative review explains CODEX tissue imaging, processing limitations and spatial analysis. Its disease examples summarize cited studies; they do not supply a new patient cohort or independent replication. The review calls for stronger causal and prospective validation.
Supplied review text and qualified figures readSiraj, Loeb and colleagues outline requirements for a proposed interstellar-object intercept. Detection and reachability forecasts depend on assumptions; material analogues and modelled spectra do not identify an artificial object.
Preprint text and figures readWeerasekera, Nolan and colleagues model relationships between brain-region volumes and cognition in 193 healthy adults. This is background neuroscience, with no UAP-exposure or injury cohort.
Paper text, figures and supplements readFelkai Ádám reports Loeb’s interpretation of Ukrainian UAP observations and relays a Kyiv observatory council statement questioning distances, processing, missing dates and ordinary explanations. Government-request attribution passes through a linked account subsequently read as S7768; it remains a relay without an original request record. The council original and Ukrainian authors’ reply remain unreceived.
Complete supplied Hungarian article; relayed originals remain missingA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach