Jeffrey Nuccetelli. oversight.house.gov. September 9, 2025.
Nuccetelli reports five incidents and information from six service members, while personally seeing one event. Contractor and guard accounts are distinguished from his own radio reception, response and arrival. He attributes investigation records to the command and claimed custody to AARO and the FBI without supplying originals. A later patrol account retains hovered-or-landed uncertainty; subsequent threats have unnamed actors. His own visual account and author rejection of misidentification do not establish every reported interpretation.
■ Received written text and native layouts; originals and interpretation gaps
Graves distinguishes his multisensor observations from colleagues’ visual reports and accounts received by Americans for Safe Aerospace. He relays Gallaudet’s account of a 2015 safety email and presumed classification; original messages and sensor records were not supplied. Software glitches and foreign drones appear as ordinary possibilities. Aircraft performance and commercial-witness estimates remain attributed claims. Reporting and declassification proposals are recommendations; official hosting does not establish the encounter interpretations.
■ Received written text and native layouts; originals and interpretation gaps
Fravor describes his November 2004 visual encounter separately from controller radar reports and a later crew’s recording. The inferred transit assumes a subsequent radar return was the same object. He reports contacts from Stratton, Dietrich and Elizondo; Dietrich’s Pentagon invitations are relayed. The 2016 conversation and ensuing resignation/TTSA chronology remain unresolved. Recovery-programme assertions are attributed and conditional. No original radar, video, messages or agency records were received in this review.
■ Received written text and native layouts; original-record and interpretation gaps