TTSA describes a reported Army approach and proposed collaboration, while acknowledging experimental work and uncertainty about material provenance. The FAQ does not supply the signed agreement, access logs or test results.
Complete supplied institutional FAQ; agreement unreviewedThis coauthored review surveys reported aerospace and undersea phenomena, historical cases and proposed research. Selected figure pages distinguish drawings, photographs, material reports and hypothetical interpretations. Its coauthors and reproduced cases do not supply independent verification of underlying events, anomalous materials or government programmes.
Prior supplied HTML; all 195 retained native layouts viewedRice’s public finding aid describes the Edwin May collection, donated in2018–2019, and lists remote-viewing folders and six digital groups. This review covers catalogue text. The underlying archival documents and recordings remain unread. The listing supports the existence of catalogued material; it does not confirm Buchanan’s later donation request was fulfilled or establish claims made within the collection.
Complete public finding-aid, digital-object metadata and access policy; originals unreadThe second profile relays claimed Senate and Defence Department briefing requests and an Army collaboration. It preserves Wilson’s denial of the alleged2002 meeting, disputed material provenance and unsuccessful earlier tests. These recurring accounts do not independently authenticate a memo, retrieval programme or anomalous material.
Complete supplied public text; original records missingPuthoff reports a subcontractor approach, congressional and classified-level briefings, foreign meetings and promised materials. His technical account explicitly retains nonexistent sample custody, questionable provenance, possible hoax or slag, experiments not yet done and engineering beyond present capabilities. The main lecture complements the previously read Q&A; these accounts do not authenticate recovered craft or material delivery.
Supplied main lecture text readA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach