BioParity.UFO / UAP research

3 sources for “Image analysis”

Results

PaperS7568

SPACEc: a streamlined, interactive Python workflow for multiplexed image processing and analysis

Yuqi Tan, Tim N Kempchen, Martin Becker, Maximilian Haist, Dorien Feyaerts, Jiaqi Liu, Marieta Toma, Yang Xiao, Graham Su, Andrew J Rech, Michael Hölzel, Rong Fan, John W Hickey, Garry P Nolan. ebi.ac.uk. November 27, 2025.

SPACEc combines spatial proteomics processing, cell annotation and neighbourhood analysis. Nolan is credited with supervision. The supplied article, static supplement and reporting form were reviewed; peer-review correspondence is partly read. Reused tissues, expert labels and nested cell counts limit independent replication. Computational comparisons depend on dataset, platform, normalization and metric definitions; funding does not establish a UAP programme.

Complete supplied main and static supplement text read; peer review partial
PaperS7514

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. Characterization of Dark UAPs

Boris Zhilyaev, Vladimir Petukhov, Sergey Pokhvala. arxiv.org. February 13, 2025.

This preprint infers large sizes, speeds and low albedo from Kyiv observations and third-party lunar and combat videos. The interpretation depends on calibration and geometry assumptions; original recordings and raw data are absent. Repeated events, conflicting numbers and uncertain video custody remain explicit.

Supplied preprint text and figures read
ArticleS7594

Paris Technical Conference Takes a Closer Look at Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena

Baptiste Friscourt. The Debrief. April 6, 2024.

Friscourt reports Mellon’s government-source accounts and interviews him after a Paris presentation. Mellon doubts clear images are available for release. The article also preserves infrared ambiguities, hypnosis concerns and failed analysis as an alternative explanation for contractor silence.

Complete supplied reporter article read; original events unreviewed

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach