Explore the accounts, documents and research behind UFOs and UAP.
We add newly reviewed sources as they are ready. Not all of our research is public yet.
381 sources so far
Paulides discusses disappearances, personal contacts and relayed encounter narratives with Rogan. Claimed government callbacks, private invitations and multi-step hearsay remain separate from interpretation; ordinary explanations, corrections and original-record gaps are preserved.
Complete supplied third-party transcript; original episode unverifiedBurchett recounts briefings, home-visitor footage and unnamed witness accounts. The underwater-base story is corrected to sightings near deep-water areas, without an observed base. Gaetz’s hybrid story is explicitly unverified. His Eglin pilot count differs from Luna’s account of the same delegation.
Supplied AI transcript text readKnuth recounts a conversation with Elizondo at a scientists and government meeting, relays laboratory sample accounts and describes personal anomalous experiences. Ordinary sample findings, unanswered questions, competing explanations and uncertainty remain part of the account. Reported contacts do not establish classified access or programme recruitment.
Supplied transcript readHastings describes purported Puthoff and Elizondo contacts, while relaying programme, film, funding and veteran-interview accounts. The update repeats established nuclear-UFO source families. Favorable initial interview reception, handwritten notes, a competing official conclusion and earlier ordinary alternatives remain preserved. Conflicting contact, interview and book-update dates are unresolved; scientific and disclosure predictions are attributed interpretations.
Supplied epilogue and references readLoeb recounts apparent zig-zag motion that his team attributed to missing camera data and triangulation-software malfunction. He explicitly denies classified-video access at that time. His release-announcement account is relayed through a news link; proposed material testing supplies neither a recovered sample nor custody evidence.
Complete supplied authored text; original records/media gapsRogan and Trussell discuss UAP narratives, reported Corbell conversations and a friend’s alleged historical government contact. Contextual speaker uncertainty, nested relays, skepticism, ordinary alternatives and corrections remain explicit. This is a related conversation; Corbell is not the guest.
Complete supplied related transcript; original recording unreviewedLazar recounts his alleged S4 work while Vendittelli discusses a film reconstructed from that account. Insider briefings, uncertain physics and disputed materials are preserved alongside Lazar’s explicit limits; reconstruction-prompted memories are part of the source history.
Transcript text readThis lymphoma study combines new tissue profiling, reused datasets, limited cell cultures and retrospective survival associations to propose a model of altered tissue organization. Its assays overlap an earlier Nolan-linked atlas, and cells or repeated measurements are not independent patients. Data-derived survival thresholds and unresolved denominator/method wording qualify clinical interpretation. Nolan provided access to existing imaging and immune datasets; this article does not assign him a funding award or report a classified UAP approach.
Complete specialist supplied XML text; native apparatus unreviewedRizzo Nervo, Nolan and colleagues model influenza shedding and time since exposure in two controlled challenge datasets. Preinfection baselines and selected healthy cohorts constrain generalization. Several count, legend, validation-method and error-metric descriptions disagree; this is not a UAP-exposure study.
Article, figures and narrative supplements readDolan presents an unconfirmed Carter-era exhibition interpretation relayed through Lavigne and Lorenzen. His growing confidence remains opinion. Previously reviewed contrary admissions and unsupported reader allegations stay explicit.
Supplied written framing and comment snapshot readDolan says an unnamed source told him a Carter-briefing story nearly twenty years earlier. Receiving a story differs from witnessing the alleged briefing. His strong confidence remains alongside the related video’s future-research caveat.
Supplied written framing and comments readGallaudet reviews reported NOAA achievements and a forecasting failure, and offers policy recommendations. This provides professional context rather than a new UAP encounter, private briefing or government invitation.
Complete offered professional article; no new UAP-contact accountA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach