BioParity.UFO / UAP research

20 sources for “Research support”

Results

ReportS7629

Rice MS0773 Edwin C. May papers — public finding aid, Box48 metadata and digital index

Rice University, Woodson Research Center, Christopher Senn, Thomas Millary. archives.library.rice.edu. 2019.

Rice’s public finding aid describes the Edwin May collection, donated in2018–2019, and lists remote-viewing folders and six digital groups. This review covers catalogue text. The underlying archival documents and recordings remain unread. The listing supports the existence of catalogued material; it does not confirm Buchanan’s later donation request was fulfilled or establish claims made within the collection.

Complete public finding-aid, digital-object metadata and access policy; originals unread
PaperS7589

Defining human cardiac transcription factor hierarchies using integrated single-cell heterogeneity analysis

Jared M. Churko, Priyanka Garg, Barbara Treutlein, Meenakshi Venkatasubramanian, Haodi Wu, Jaecheol Lee, Quinton N. Wessells, Shih-Yu Chen, Wen-Yi Chen, Kashish Chetal, Gary Mantalas, Norma Neff, Eric Jabart, Arun Sharma, Garry P. Nolan, Nathan Salomonis, Joseph C. Wu. ebi.ac.uk. November 21, 2018.

The study analyzes heterogeneity in cultured cardiac differentiation and tests selected regulators. Selected cells and related perturbations provide conditional support, rather than independent donor or clinical replication. A reporting-summary conflict and several negative results remain unresolved.

Supplied main text read; large workbooks partial
PaperS7587

DRUG-NEM: Optimizing drug combinations using single-cell perturbation response to account for intratumoral heterogeneity

Benedict Anchang, Kara L. Davis, Harris G. Fienberg, Brian D. Williamson, Sean C. Bendall, Loukia G. Karacosta, Robert Tibshirani, Garry P. Nolan, Sylvia K. Plevritis. ebi.ac.uk. April 13, 2018.

DRUG-NEM ranks drug combinations using selected single-cell signaling responses. Its short-term surrogates and fixed-subpopulation assumptions limit interpretation. Repeated analyses are not new patients, and cell-line validation does not establish clinical benefit. The supplied main text is read; supporting information remains missing.

Supplied main text and mathematics read; apparatus partial
PaperS7762

The Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (HEK): II. Analysis of Seven Viable Satellite-Hosting Planet Candidates

David M. Kipping, Joel Hartman, Lars A. Buchhave, Allan R. Schmitt, Gáspár Á. Bakos, David Nesvorný. arxiv.org. January 9, 2013.

The authors find no compelling exomoon evidence among seven selected Kepler candidates. Archival transit analysis and author-reported2012 stellar spectra support conditional mass limits; physical and predictive checks reject candidate fits. Noise, starspots and model assumptions limit inference. This provides research-method context, with no independent moon or UAP confirmation.

Complete supplied manuscript; original rendition unresolved
PaperS7774

Halo observations provide evidence of airborne cubic ice in the Earth’s atmosphere

Marko Riikonen, Mika Sillanpää, Leena Virta, Daniel Sullivan, Jarmo Moilanen, Ismo Luukkonen. eso.org. November 20, 2000.

The authors compare reported Chilean halo observations with ice-crystal models. A model match supports their proposed interpretation, while direct atmospheric cubic-ice sampling remains missing. Acknowledged scholarly comments and weather-data assistance have incomplete contact records. The supplied paper does not establish an explanation for all UAP or current scientific consensus.

Supplied paper text and all six page layouts reviewed
ReportS7684

The Forensic Use of Hypnosis

Martin T. Orne, David F. Dinges, Emily Carota Orne. ojp.gov. December 1984.

Orne, Dinges and Orne’s December 1984 NIJ brief separates confidence and detail from accurate memory, describes risks of suggestion and confabulation, and allows a qualified role for investigative leads while opposing court testimony based on hypnosis. Its safeguards document sessions without guaranteeing accurate recollection. This is a historical review, not a new UFO study or current legal/clinical guidance. Public grant support and agency hosting do not establish a secret programme or agency endorsement of every author conclusion.

Complete supplied NIJ brief text and all six scan layouts
ReportS7680

FDA contract listing — selected Stanford award 75F40120C00176

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. fda.gov.

An FDA contract listing names Stanford University for 75F40120C00176, independently of the MaxFuse acknowledgement. The requirement concerns coronavirus research. Its wording differs from a later FDA presentation using the same identifier; the amendment or naming history remains unresolved. This supports a public institutional funding link, without establishing Nolan as the named principal investigator or a classified programme.

Partial root native PDF text and selected layout review
ReportS7708

NIH RePORTER metadata for 3U19AI100627-09S2

National Institutes of Health. api.reporter.nih.gov.

Official NIH metadata returns two FY2021 application records for 3U19AI100627-09S2, both naming Scripps as recipient and the same amount. Their contact PIs are Garry P. Nolan and Richard J. Ulevitch; Sage appears in neither PI list. Shared identifiers and differing dates do not establish two independent awards or their administrative relationship. The paper’s Sage/Nolan support acknowledgement is preserved as a different fact from registered PI metadata. No classified approach, agency adoption or UAP involvement is established.

Official award metadata only; scientific and award bodies unreviewed

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach