Graves distinguishes his multisensor observations from colleagues’ visual reports and accounts received by Americans for Safe Aerospace. He relays Gallaudet’s account of a 2015 safety email and presumed classification; original messages and sensor records were not supplied. Software glitches and foreign drones appear as ordinary possibilities. Aircraft performance and commercial-witness estimates remain attributed claims. Reporting and declassification proposals are recommendations; official hosting does not establish the encounter interpretations.
■ Received written text and native layouts; originals and interpretation gaps
Tim Gallaudet. oversight.house.gov. November 13, 2024.
Gallaudet reports receiving and later losing a Navy email, a personal communication from Chris Mellon about alleged satellite imagery, and a meeting with AARO staff. His reported contacts are distinguished from relayed imagery claims, inferred programme explanations and characterizations of agency motives. He expressly says he was not read into a special access programme. Proposed closed briefings and oversight measures remain proposals. Original messages, imagery, meeting records and independent accounts were not received.
■ Supplied written text and all seven received native layouts; contact and original-record gaps
Dylan Borland. oversight.house.gov. September 9, 2025.
Borland reports a 2012 sighting, later programme information and approaches by unnamed intelligence officers. Their misconduct accounts are relayed. He describes AARO, ICIG and CIA-polygraph interactions while withholding sources and methods. Contact allegations are distinguished from programme knowledge and interpretations of institutional motives. Original complaints, recordings, messages, personnel and sensor records were not received; asserted medical misconduct is not a clinical finding.
■ Received written text and native layouts; original-record and interpretation gaps
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach