Jeffrey Nuccetelli. oversight.house.gov. September 9, 2025.
Nuccetelli reports five incidents and information from six service members, while personally seeing one event. Contractor and guard accounts are distinguished from his own radio reception, response and arrival. He attributes investigation records to the command and claimed custody to AARO and the FBI without supplying originals. A later patrol account retains hovered-or-landed uncertainty; subsequent threats have unnamed actors. His own visual account and author rejection of misidentification do not establish every reported interpretation.
■ Received written text and native layouts; originals and interpretation gaps
Tim Gallaudet. oversight.house.gov. November 13, 2024.
Gallaudet reports receiving and later losing a Navy email, a personal communication from Chris Mellon about alleged satellite imagery, and a meeting with AARO staff. His reported contacts are distinguished from relayed imagery claims, inferred programme explanations and characterizations of agency motives. He expressly says he was not read into a special access programme. Proposed closed briefings and oversight measures remain proposals. Original messages, imagery, meeting records and independent accounts were not received.
■ Supplied written text and all seven received native layouts; contact and original-record gaps
Christopher Schmidt, compiler. avalonlibrary.net. January 14, 1993.
Schmidt compiles Roswell recollections, mostly attributed to Friedman and Berliner’s Crash at Corona. Review separates personal observations, family and anonymous relays, editorial brackets and later interpretation. Threat, shipment and material accounts retain missing originals and contrary details. Conflicting body counts, uncertain identities and material descriptions remain unresolved. Multiple Henderson sections share one underlying informant. This dependent compilation does not independently authenticate a crash, extraordinary materials or government custody.
■ Supplied compilation text and all 57 received layouts; original book and interviews absent
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach