Results

PaperS7777

Comment and Reply on Meteor storm evidence against the recent formation of lunar crater Giordano Bruno

Peter Nockolds, Paul Withers. sirius.bu.edu. 2002.

Nockolds proposes distortion or propaganda as an alternative explanation for the medieval account. Withers acknowledges limited Latin and chronicle access and reports a later translation discussion. The exchange preserves competing interpretations and dependence on the same historical narrative.

Complete supplied two-page comment and reply read
PaperS7774

Halo observations provide evidence of airborne cubic ice in the Earth’s atmosphere

Marko Riikonen, Mika Sillanpää, Leena Virta, Daniel Sullivan, Jarmo Moilanen, Ismo Luukkonen. eso.org. November 20, 2000.

The authors compare reported Chilean halo observations with ice-crystal models. A model match supports their proposed interpretation, while direct atmospheric cubic-ice sampling remains missing. Acknowledged scholarly comments and weather-data assistance have incomplete contact records. The supplied paper does not establish an explanation for all UAP or current scientific consensus.

Supplied paper text and all six page layouts reviewed
PaperS103

The New Science of Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena

Kevin H. Knuth, Philippe Ailleris, Hussein Ali Agrama, Eamonn Ansbro, Phyllis A. Budinger, Tejin Cai, Thibaut Canuti, Michael C. Cifone, Walter Bruce Cornet, Jr., Frédéric Courtade, Richard Dolan, Laura Domine, Luc Dini, Baptiste Friscourt, Ryan Graves, Richard F. Haines, Richard Hoffman, Hakan Kayal, Sarah Little, Garry P. Nolan, Robert Powell, Mark Rodeghier, Edoardo Russo, Peter Skafish, Erling Strand, Michael Swords, Matthew Szydagis, Gerald T. Tedesco, John J. Tedesco, Massimo Teodorani, Jacques Vallée, Michaël Vaillant, Beatriz Villarroel, Wesley A. Watters. arxiv.org. 2025.

This coauthored review surveys reported aerospace and undersea phenomena, historical cases and proposed research. Selected figure pages distinguish drawings, photographs, material reports and hypothetical interpretations. Its coauthors and reproduced cases do not supply independent verification of underlying events, anomalous materials or government programmes.

Prior supplied HTML; all 195 retained native layouts viewed

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach