The issue preserves alleged anonymous contact offers to two witnesses, an attended meeting where nobody arrived and a site visit that found no claimed facility. Hind recalls private conversations and a civilian meeting invitation from Hynek. Willsher recounts an uncertain contractor conversation; Wintle critiques missing follow-up in Alien Base. Attributed recollections retain missing originals, contrary observations and an explicitly fictional officer story. No22 publishes witness corrections to the received first-draft account; the original copy remains preserved.
■ Complete supplied issue text; ten native layouts
Richard Dolan. richarddolanmembers.com. August 21, 2024.
Dolan reports arranging an Elizondo interview while explicitly describing his book review as unfinished. Personal familiarity supports his sincerity assessment, without verifying the underlying claims. Readers offer contrary interpretations and unsupported relays.
■ Supplied written post and discussion snapshot read
Rutan reports a solitary light sighting and an unsuccessful private propulsion approach, followed by introductions to Puthoff, Alexander and Bigelow. He says Rich never hinted extraterrestrial matters to him, Corso’s reverse-engineering account was unconvincing, and his routine USAF advisory work brought no ET-hardware briefing. These are bounded findings from his experience; they do not establish what other officials knew.
Richard Dolan. richarddolanmembers.com. September 16, 2026.
Dolan publishes a correction and reports professional contact from Jennice Vilhauer. The written post and site-labelled author reply belong to the existing video-correction family; they provide no independent government-contact or programme evidence.
■ Complete supplied written post and author reply; related originals retain separate scopes
Loeb reports accepting an ODNI representative’s request to establish a science advisory council and requesting more than 50 items. He describes unclassified council analysis; the article does not demonstrate material delivery or his personal classified access.
Loeb reports a special request from an unnamed high-level US-government official to summarize his thoughts on Ukrainian UAP reports. He places it last evening, followed by morning investigation and a paper hours later. The essay gives no official identity, agency, request channel or independently dated contact. Its October4 header and relayed October6 account leave revision timing unresolved; the scientific commentary overlaps his paper.
■ Complete supplied written creator essay; contact and revision gaps retained
Cynthia Hind, Maria Sullivan, Prier Wintle. files.afu.se. July 1988.
Hind recounts police testimony and contrary laboratory claims at Rosmead, says she has access to unnamed governmental psychologists, and publishes a former consul’s personal sighting account. Proposed cooperation and reported official roles do not establish programme access. Retrospective sleep-related reports, prompted recollections, ordinary alternatives and negative searches remain explicit. The accompanying book review and evolutionary essay are distinct from verified clinical or technical findings.