Christopher Sharp. liberationtimes.com. June 16, 2026.
Sharp attributes a statement about interagency UAP coordination to an unnamed ODNI official and prints selected charter excerpts. The article also connects Loeb’s science council to the board. These reported roles concern investigation and declassification coordination; they do not establish completed access to classified material or recovered technology.
■ Complete supplied article and offered images; official originals unreviewed
Ryan Sprague, Robert Powell. podscripts.co. November 25, 2024.
Powell recounts SCU correspondence requesting AARO’s public analysis and his own witness interviews and Stephenville investigation. The aerial events remain witnesses’ accounts and analytical claims without their original records. He distinguishes those activities from alleged hidden craft documents and acknowledges evidence and access gaps.
Abraham (Avi) Loeb, Frank H. Laukien. galileo.hsites.harvard.edu. February 13, 2023.
Loeb and Laukien outline instrument-based investigations of aerial phenomena, interstellar objects and meteor fragments. The paper describes a research programme and proposed methods, rather than a confirmed anomalous discovery.
Von Ludwiger compiles European reports and investigations, including attributed military and institutional contacts. A witness alleges an unnamed Air Force officer borrowed a fragment; the loan records and official identity are absent. The book also concludes that its reported tungsten-carbide/cobalt composition was compatible with ordinary manufacture. Radar accounts conflict, hypnosis and later face selection introduce dependence, and photographic estimates rely on unverified assumptions. Reading these accounts preserves claims and contrary findings without authenticating a programme or recovered craft.
■ Complete supplied augmented book read; original-edition and source-record gaps
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach