Results

InterviewS7611

White House Creates a UAP Science Council

Avi Loeb. avi-loeb.medium.com. June 2026.

In Loeb’s transcript of his NewsNation interview, he describes government cooperation but says exact government holdings are unclear. Vargas raises unnamed insider and contractor-secrecy claims; Loeb welcomes future evidence. Conditional material access, motive inferences and the journalist’s questions remain distinct from demonstrated custody or official records.

Complete supplied author transcript; original interview AV unreviewed
BookS7450

Above Top Secret — reviewed paperback narrative and apparatus

Timothy Good. archive.org.

Good assembles official-document reproductions, eyewitness accounts and insider relays about UFO secrecy. Goldwater reports denied access; several officials expressly lacked firsthand knowledge. Anonymous recovery claims and purported MJ-12 papers retain authentication and custody gaps. Conventional explanations, denials, inconsistent dates, a forged contact document and Hottel’s absence of further evaluation remain. A newly legible CIRVIS time field validates neither the event nor the reproduced record’s provenance.

All 612 supplied layouts reviewed; fine apparatus and original edition remain partial
ReportS7709

50 U.S.C. § 3093 — Presidential approval and reporting of covert actions (2024 Edition)

United States Congress. govinfo.gov.

The 2024 Edition sets conditions for presidential covert-action findings and congressional reporting. Restricted access retains reasons, periodic review and committee notice/records. Its covert-action definition concerns unacknowledged overseas influence and excludes specified intelligence, military, diplomatic and other activities; secrecy alone does not establish that classification. The text also prohibits specified domestic influence. This is historical legal context, with later changes and current application unverified; it proves no specific UAP programme or achieved access.

Complete historical section scope; current application unreviewed

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach