Results

InterviewS7582

Avi Loeb Comments on the UFO Files and Extraterrestrials

Avi Loeb. avi-loeb.medium.com. May 26, 2026.

Loeb says the shown objects do not establish extraterrestrial origin. An anonymous officer’s account is relayed testimony. His proposed cleared review board is a recommendation, with no appointment or access established.

Supplied semantic dialogue read; native recording unreviewed
PaperS103

The New Science of Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena

Kevin H. Knuth, Philippe Ailleris, Hussein Ali Agrama, Eamonn Ansbro, Phyllis A. Budinger, Tejin Cai, Thibaut Canuti, Michael C. Cifone, Walter Bruce Cornet, Jr., Frédéric Courtade, Richard Dolan, Laura Domine, Luc Dini, Baptiste Friscourt, Ryan Graves, Richard F. Haines, Richard Hoffman, Hakan Kayal, Sarah Little, Garry P. Nolan, Robert Powell, Mark Rodeghier, Edoardo Russo, Peter Skafish, Erling Strand, Michael Swords, Matthew Szydagis, Gerald T. Tedesco, John J. Tedesco, Massimo Teodorani, Jacques Vallée, Michaël Vaillant, Beatriz Villarroel, Wesley A. Watters. arxiv.org. 2025.

This coauthored review surveys reported aerospace and undersea phenomena, historical cases and proposed research. Selected figure pages distinguish drawings, photographs, material reports and hypothetical interpretations. Its coauthors and reproduced cases do not supply independent verification of underlying events, anomalous materials or government programmes.

Prior supplied HTML; all 195 retained native layouts viewed
ArticleS7601

Being Eric Davis, Part 2

The Observer. theobservermagazine.substack.com. April 15, 2021.

The second profile relays claimed Senate and Defence Department briefing requests and an Army collaboration. It preserves Wilson’s denial of the alleged2002 meeting, disputed material provenance and unsuccessful earlier tests. These recurring accounts do not independently authenticate a memo, retrieval programme or anomalous material.

Complete supplied public text; original records missing

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach