Rice University, Woodson Research Center, Christopher Senn, Thomas Millary. archives.library.rice.edu. 2019.
Rice’s public finding aid describes the Edwin May collection, donated in2018–2019, and lists remote-viewing folders and six digital groups. This review covers catalogue text. The underlying archival documents and recordings remain unread. The listing supports the existence of catalogued material; it does not confirm Buchanan’s later donation request was fulfilled or establish claims made within the collection.
■ Complete public finding-aid, digital-object metadata and access policy; originals unread
Martin T. Orne, David F. Dinges, Emily Carota Orne. ojp.gov. December 1984.
Orne, Dinges and Orne’s December 1984 NIJ brief separates confidence and detail from accurate memory, describes risks of suggestion and confabulation, and allows a qualified role for investigative leads while opposing court testimony based on hypnosis. Its safeguards document sessions without guaranteeing accurate recollection. This is a historical review, not a new UFO study or current legal/clinical guidance. Public grant support and agency hosting do not establish a secret programme or agency endorsement of every author conclusion.
■ Complete supplied NIJ brief text and all six scan layouts
An FDA contract listing names Stanford University for 75F40120C00176, independently of the MaxFuse acknowledgement. The requirement concerns coronavirus research. Its wording differs from a later FDA presentation using the same identifier; the amendment or naming history remains unresolved. This supports a public institutional funding link, without establishing Nolan as the named principal investigator or a classified programme.
◧ Partial root native PDF text and selected layout review
National Institutes of Health. api.reporter.nih.gov.
Official NIH metadata returns two FY2021 application records for 3U19AI100627-09S2, both naming Scripps as recipient and the same amount. Their contact PIs are Garry P. Nolan and Richard J. Ulevitch; Sage appears in neither PI list. Shared identifiers and differing dates do not establish two independent awards or their administrative relationship. The paper’s Sage/Nolan support acknowledgement is preserved as a different fact from registered PI metadata. No classified approach, agency adoption or UAP involvement is established.
■ Official award metadata only; scientific and award bodies unreviewed
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach