Peter Nockolds, Paul Withers. sirius.bu.edu. 2002.
Nockolds proposes distortion or propaganda as an alternative explanation for the medieval account. Withers acknowledges limited Latin and chronicle access and reports a later translation discussion. The exchange preserves competing interpretations and dependence on the same historical narrative.
■ Complete supplied two-page comment and reply read
Kevin Yau, Paul Weissman, Donald Yeomans. articles.adsabs.harvard.edu. November 1994.
Yau, Weissman and Yeomans examine historical Chinese meteorite reports and disputed casualty accounts. Their concluding discussion attributes apparent frequency changes to reporting biases. They cannot verify the historical casualty claims; statistical and flux comparisons depend on assumptions that this project has not tested.
■ Complete supplied eight-page article and native layouts read
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach