Results

PaperS7634

Bayesian evidence and model selection

Kevin H. Knuth, Michael Habeck, Nabin K. Malakar, Asim M. Mubeen, Ben Placek. knuthlab.org. June 29, 2015.

Knuth and colleagues explain Bayesian evidence, prior-sensitive model comparison and approximate estimation. Their examples show how assumptions, dependent observations and numerical uncertainty affect apparent model winners. The paper provides methods context for evaluating claims; its sensor example overlaps an earlier study and supplies no independent UAP observations.

Complete supplied methods text and selected native figures/tables read
PaperS7635

Inferences about Interactions: Fermions and the Dirac Equation

Kevin H. Knuth. arxiv.org. December 11, 2012.

Knuth connects ordered-event projections and measurement-sequence inference to an at-rest 1+1-dimensional Dirac checkerboard model. Coordinated observers, local flatness and chosen amplitudes condition the construction. A mass relationship is hypothesized and higher-dimensional extension proposed. This theoretical lineage supplies context rather than independent UAP observations.

Complete supplied preprint text and selected native diagrams read
PaperS7752

Measuring on Lattices

Kevin H. Knuth. arxiv.org. September 21, 2009.

Knuth develops valuation and inference rules on ordered lattices under stated assumptions. This formal methods paper supplies no empirical UAP observations; proof, normalization and later-rendering issues remain explicit.

Complete supplied thirteen-page manuscript; formal inference framework
PaperS7766

The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth

P. Brown, R. E. Spalding, D. O. ReVelle, E. Tagliaferri, S. P. Worden. aquarid.physics.uwo.ca. November 21, 2002.

Brown and colleagues estimate small near-Earth-object flux using bolide observations and conditional optical-energy calibration. Integral luminous efficiency depends on energy and population, assuming a6000K spectrum; fitted6–15% and adopted5–20% ranges qualify a universal10% assumption. The article retains an unusual excluded event and explicit nonendorsement by the US DoD.

Complete supplied three-page text and native layouts; calibration limits

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach