Results

ArticleS7662

UFO Afrinews No19 (January 1999) — military-contact stories and unresolved follow-ups

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. January 1999.

Pete Willsher recalls questioning by military personnel and a colonel showing photographs; separate stories describe Edwin’s alleged police encounter and reported Air Force transport for Elizabeth Klarer. The issue also records unresolved witness follow-ups, ordinary explanations and disputed book claims. Each account retains its speaker, relay chain and missing originals.

Complete supplied issue text; seven native layouts
ArticleS7661

UFO Afrinews No18 (July 1998) — reported official follow-up and disputed accounts

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. July 1998.

The issue describes a police pilot’s reported Air Force questionnaire visit, conflicting radar accounts and Venus, autokinesis or drone alternatives. Witness follow-ups and Corso commentary retain their relay chains, missing originals and contrary interpretations. The magazine reports these claims; it does not establish a secret programme, alien technology or medical causation.

Complete supplied issue text; six native layouts
ArticleS7660

UFO Afrinews No17 (1998) — witness follow-ups and source qualifications

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. 1998.

Hind records witness follow-ups, ordinary explanations and negative site findings, while distinguishing her own conference attendance from relayed stories. A proposed research invitation was not taken up. Medical claims, government-interest arguments and reader opinions retain their missing originals and source dependencies.

Complete supplied issue text; selected illustrations
ArticleS7670

UFO Afrinews No6 (July 1992) — layered military accounts and later tabloid retractions

Cynthia Hind. files.afu.se. July 1992.

Radio callers describe a daughter’s alleged invitation and unnamed military encounters, with missing originals and Hind’s skeptical responses preserved. A book review relays claims of official cooperation while questioning their reliability. Two tabloid tales reproduced here were explicitly retracted as fabricated in No10. Witness revisions, unachieved follow-ups and ordinary explanations remain attributed; reported contact does not establish a classified programme or material access.

Complete supplied issue text; fifteen native layouts

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach