Explore the accounts, documents and research behind UFOs and UAP.
We add newly reviewed sources as they are ready. Not all of our research is public yet.
381 sources so far
Coulthart and UAP Gerb discuss alleged managed disclosure and programme histories. Partial English ASR plus a dependent Japanese rendition preserve anonymous relays and disagreements. Later material includes an unnamed former DOD official demanding proof. No authenticated appointment, briefing, programme or custody is established.
Partial English ASR plus dependent Japanese continuationLoeb reports a coauthored analysis interpreting six infrared dots as birds, using flicker and parallax. His categorical title sits alongside an explicit need for missing telemetry and unredacted footage before conclusive results. This essay concerns the previously discussed six-dot study; its figures, paper and underlying records were not reviewed here. No new private briefing or government approach is reported.
Complete supplied authored essay; figures and underlying records unreviewedThe 2024 Edition of this oversight provision distinguishes case-specific withholding from supplying information and justification to committee leadership. Its annual-report wording also carries a termination note referring to December 2021. Cross-referenced provisions and later changes have not been collated, so current application remains unverified. This is historical statutory context for programme-access claims, not evidence that a UAP programme existed or anyone obtained access.
Complete returned historical section; current application unreviewedAn unsigned creator-site narrative retells Brent Friedman’s alleged 1981 conversation with John S. Herrington, a later relay to Bryce Zabel, and subsequent Grusch interest. Brent is the claimed recipient; alleged alien briefings are remembered Herrington assertions, not Brent’s observations. The site preserves Herrington’s denial, absent documentary proof and the explicit point that Grusch’s recognition does not prove the conversation. This is another written retelling of an existing event family, with no newly verified witness or direct testimony.
Complete supplied written retelling; firsthand account unverifiedOfficial NIH metadata returns two FY2021 application records for 3U19AI100627-09S2, both naming Scripps as recipient and the same amount. Their contact PIs are Garry P. Nolan and Richard J. Ulevitch; Sage appears in neither PI list. Shared identifiers and differing dates do not establish two independent awards or their administrative relationship. The paper’s Sage/Nolan support acknowledgement is preserved as a different fact from registered PI metadata. No classified approach, agency adoption or UAP involvement is established.
Official award metadata only; scientific and award bodies unreviewedThe 2024 Edition sets conditions for presidential covert-action findings and congressional reporting. Restricted access retains reasons, periodic review and committee notice/records. Its covert-action definition concerns unacknowledged overseas influence and excludes specified intelligence, military, diplomatic and other activities; secrecy alone does not establish that classification. The text also prohibits specified domestic influence. This is historical legal context, with later changes and current application unverified; it proves no specific UAP programme or achieved access.
Complete historical section scope; current application unreviewedTTSA describes a reported Army approach and proposed collaboration, while acknowledging experimental work and uncertainty about material provenance. The FAQ does not supply the signed agreement, access logs or test results.
Complete supplied institutional FAQ; agreement unreviewedTTSA announces a planned Army collaboration and attributes statements to Joseph Cannon and Steve Justice. Prospective material research and resource-sharing claims are not supplied experiment results or corroborated access.
Complete supplied corporate announcement; agreement unreviewedGreer discusses claimed official contacts, relayed insider stories and prospective energy tests with Art Bell. The supplied interview includes an explicit correction of a host attribution and challenges to earlier demonstration promises.
Complete offered written interview; original broadcast unreviewedA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach