Amir Siraj, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. April 15, 2019.
Siraj and Loeb infer an interstellar meteor trajectory from catalogue inputs and an assumed error model. The paper attributes uncertainty information to Heavner and quotes a reported DoD statement, with Worden, Daniels, Shaw, Mozer, an anonymous analyst and Hurd credited for distinct clarification roles. Original correspondence and classified data were not received. Conditional confidence, ordinary bound comparators, population assumptions and mass-budget tension remain. Government review does not establish researcher classified access, artificial origin or recovered material.
■ Received preprint text and native layouts; original data and contact gaps
Christopher Mellon. christopherkmellon.substack.com. August 1, 2007.
Mellon’s historical essay argues for changing government network architecture. He reports discussions with unnamed federal officials and quotes a congressional warning. These are attributed policy and contact accounts, with no UAP programme disclosure or verified current security assessment.
■ Complete supplied author repost read; original publisher missing
Hynek recounts his investigation work, a reported Air Force invitation and consultancy, and encounters with witnesses. He distinguishes secondhand reports from his own ambiguous observations and considers ordinary explanations. The reviewed book accounts do not independently authenticate appointments, original correspondence, case evidence or classified access.
■ Supplied OCR; all 341 retained scan layouts viewed
Avi Loeb. avi-loeb.medium.com. September 26, 2026.
Loeb recounts festival conversations, a panel invitation and an email announcing a forthcoming collaborative six-dot analysis. His named social contacts and descriptions of prior official roles remain author-reported. The essay supplies neither the promised paper nor measurements, and does not establish secret government tasking, classified access or custody.
■ Complete supplied primary-author essay text; original media and records remain gaps
This separate rendition supplies later chapters and apparatus. Native-layout review preserves reported private contacts and invitations, the author’s correction of a government role attributed to him, ordinary material results and unresolved witness accounts. These reports do not authenticate original records, programme access or case conclusions.
■ Received native layouts 179 of 179 reviewed; original edition gaps
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach