John E. Shaw (typed signer in author-hosted reproduction). lweb.cfa.harvard.edu. March 1, 2022.
This author-hosted reproduction presents a Space Command memorandum to NASA. Its first paragraph attributes 99.999% confidence to the Siraj–Loeb paper; the second reports Mozer’s qualitative confirmation of a sufficiently accurate velocity estimate. It supplies no raw data, numerical uncertainty analysis or researcher classified access. The page concerns the same meteor chain, rather than a new detection or technological-origin finding.
■ Author-hosted public reproduction read; official authentication unresolved
Amir Siraj, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. September 12, 2019.
Siraj and Loeb argue that a roughly kilometer-scale Borisov nucleus better matches an assumed ordinary Oort-cloud mass budget. An eight-kilometer alternative produces substantial tension with that benchmark, without independently disproving the larger size. Their figure uses four points for three object families, including two alternative Borisov radii. Sparse Poisson bounds do not capture every observing or population uncertainty. This is a conditional argument using reported observations, not a new measurement campaign or artificial-origin finding.
■ Received written text and native layouts; originals and interpretation gaps
Amir Siraj, Abraham Loeb. arxiv.org. April 15, 2019.
Siraj and Loeb infer an interstellar meteor trajectory from catalogue inputs and an assumed error model. The paper attributes uncertainty information to Heavner and quotes a reported DoD statement, with Worden, Daniels, Shaw, Mozer, an anonymous analyst and Hurd credited for distinct clarification roles. Original correspondence and classified data were not received. Conditional confidence, ordinary bound comparators, population assumptions and mass-budget tension remain. Government review does not establish researcher classified access, artificial origin or recovered material.
■ Received preprint text and native layouts; original data and contact gaps
Nabin K. Malakar, Daniil Gladkov, Kevin H. Knuth. arxiv.org. March 18, 2013.
A calibrated light-sensor model helps a robot locate a known white circle with fewer reported measurements. The task uses fixed lighting, distance and prior shape assumptions. Supplied uncertainty values are missing, and native equation, count and date discrepancies remain unresolved. These results do not establish general object recognition or UAP performance.
■ Complete supplied18-page preprint read; final version and raw gaps
Waddington argues that calendrical wording in the quoted Gervase passage favors June 19, 1178. He separates dating the text from identifying the reported sign and acknowledges interpretive uncertainty. The complete supplied CCNet letter copy was read; originals and numerical replication remain absent.
To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science. tothestars.media.
TTSA describes a reported Army approach and proposed collaboration, while acknowledging experimental work and uncertainty about material provenance. The FAQ does not supply the signed agreement, access logs or test results.