Explore the accounts, documents and research behind UFOs and UAP.
We add newly reviewed sources as they are ready. Not all of our research is public yet.
381 sources so far
Gallaudet recalls NOAA leadership contacts, advice to remain after SharpieGate and an invitation to shark research that headquarters lawyers opposed. He says he was never asked to state an untruth. This career interview contains no UAP or classified-programme disclosure.
Complete supplied producer transcript read; original records missingDolan publishes a correction and reports professional contact from Jennice Vilhauer. The written post and site-labelled author reply belong to the existing video-correction family; they provide no independent government-contact or programme evidence.
Complete supplied written post and author reply; related originals retain separate scopesLoeb recounts two recent meetings with an intelligence official and an author-hosted NewsNation interview about disclosures. Facility access and material analysis remain conditional; he calls released footage inconclusive and retains human-made alternatives.
Supplied author text and dialogue readSharp examines Kammler’s disputed fate alongside anonymous claims connecting Nazi and U.S. technology programmes to UAP. Family stories, historical records, fiction and intelligence-source allegations remain distinct. The article preserves Roswell nonconfirmation, AARO’s broader no-evidence statement and possible embellishment or counterintelligence explanations. The larger UAP account remains unverified.
Complete supplied article and offered images; archives and AV unreviewedThe producer relays Gallaudet’s reported AARO invitation, missing-email recollection and private-council request to hear NDA-bound witnesses. Influence-operation and domestic-technology conclusions are interpretations. The article repeats the account in S127/S1676 and supplies no new independent witness or original meeting records.
Complete creator companion article; original interview already registeredA preprint abstract describes spatial proteomic and epigenomic mapping of the human hippocampus, with Nolan as a coauthor. The substantive paper was unavailable through the checked routes, so its methods and reported results have not been assessed.
Abstract onlyDavis describes institutional hiring, contractor contacts, documentary assessment and a request from senior Defense officials to speak at a workshop. He distinguishes an unclassified talk from the classified workshop, and documentary access from access to craft or bodies. Failed proposals, negative field results, participant relays and reporting dependencies remain part of the account. These are his statements; the original invitations, records and recordings were not received.
Supplied transcript text readHaqq-Misra and Kopparapu analyse limits on inferring motion from 112 released sensor-video records. Angular motion depends on range, viewing geometry and platform motion. A transverse-speed bound does not establish total speed or identify every object.
Preprint text, figures and tables readLoeb reports an ODNI/AARO approach, a 20-member council and about 12 Zoom meetings. The Washington meeting described here was planned for the following week. He says released videos need additional metadata; no material delivery or classified access is demonstrated.
Supplied author text readDolan argues that a factional struggle better explains disclosure disputes than a unified government campaign.
Public article text readKnuth recounts military missile stories heard from a professor and a relative, qualifies the camera assumption in a FLIR calculation, and describes sonar data he says he received from an unnamed operator. The original records are absent and some remembered numbers conflict. Nongovernment research invitations, natural-orb possibilities and perceptual explanations remain distinct from evidence of classified access.
Supplied automatic transcript readMichels recounts interviews, personal sightings and stories from named and unnamed contacts. Reported missile encounters, fragment handling, Brazilian medical accounts and an abandoned proposal are retained with corrections, hearsay chains and memory limitations.
Transcript text readA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach