BioParity.UFO / UAP research

2 papers for “Author context”

Results

PaperS7692

Organization of the human intestine at single-cell resolution

John W. Hickey, Winston R. Becker, Stephanie A. Nevins, Aaron Horning, Almudena Espin Perez, Chenchen Zhu, Bokai Zhu, Bei Wei, Roxanne Chiu, Derek C. Chen, Daniel L. Cotter, Edward D. Esplin, Annika K. Weimer, Chiara Caraccio, Vishal Venkataraaman, Christian M. Schürch, Sarah Black, Maria Brbić, Kaidi Cao, Shuxiao Chen, Weiruo Zhang, Emma Monte, Nancy R. Zhang, Zongming Ma, Jure Leskovec, Zhengyan Zhang, Shin Lin, Teri Longacre, Sylvia K. Plevritis, Yiing Lin, Garry P. Nolan, William J. Greenleaf, Michael Snyder. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. July 19, 2023.

This healthy-adult intestine atlas describes regional tissue composition and spatial organization in nine donors. Millions of cells and regional sections remain nested within donors. Predicted signalling and regulatory associations are hypotheses; subset validation overlaps one donor and does not establish a clinical or causal mechanism. Nolan is a corresponding coauthor and supervisor. Published funding and commercial disclosures provide ordinary research context, without establishing a classified approach or UAP programme.

Complete specialist supplied XML text; native apparatus unreviewed
PaperS7762

The Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (HEK): II. Analysis of Seven Viable Satellite-Hosting Planet Candidates

David M. Kipping, Joel Hartman, Lars A. Buchhave, Allan R. Schmitt, Gáspár Á. Bakos, David Nesvorný. arxiv.org. January 9, 2013.

The authors find no compelling exomoon evidence among seven selected Kepler candidates. Archival transit analysis and author-reported2012 stellar spectra support conditional mass limits; physical and predictive checks reject candidate fits. Noise, starspots and model assumptions limit inference. This provides research-method context, with no independent moon or UAP confirmation.

Complete supplied manuscript; original rendition unresolved

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach