Tim Gallaudet, Laura Thorne, Nic Frederick. environmentalprofessionalsradio.buzzsprout.com. September 18, 2026.
Gallaudet recalls NOAA leadership contacts, advice to remain after SharpieGate and an invitation to shark research that headquarters lawyers opposed. He says he was never asked to state an untruth. This career interview contains no UAP or classified-programme disclosure.
■ Complete supplied producer transcript read; original records missing
Tim Gallaudet, Kelly Savoie, Emma Collins. ametsoc.org. August 18, 2026.
Gallaudet’s career interview describes ordinary NOAA recruitment and appointments, plus a reported hurricane-repair funding meeting and a relayed operational weather account. The supplied conversation contains no UAP programme invitation or recovered-material claim. Publication and recording dates, damaged names and missing original records remain qualified.
■ Complete supplied producer transcript read; original pages and recording unreviewed
Tim Gallaudet, Gary Anderson. iheart.com. July 24, 2026.
Gallaudet reports manuscript review, advisory-board recommendations, government letters and endorsement refusals. He also relays anonymous submarine accounts and an alleged intelligence email with video; direct custody and viewing remain unknown. He distinguishes reported ocean regions from bases and says he lacks bathymetric evidence for bases. A described NOAA expedition found no UAP or civilization evidence.
Tim Gallaudet, Matt Ford. spreaker.com. July 2, 2025.
Gallaudet reports an invited AARO visit, political-appointee contacts and accounts received from Navy and NOAA personnel. Ford later reads statements attributed to Eric Davis and Luis Elizondo, including Davis’s doubts about Art’s parts provenance. Their originals and the underlying records are missing. Ford’s proposed Pentagon communications plan is explicitly his interpretation.
■ Complete supplied automatic transcript read; original recording and records unreviewed
A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach