Pasulka reports intelligence-agency interest and a scientist’s invitation to an alleged site. She distinguishes scientists’ convictions from established reality and raises the possibility that her research was being used.
Both supplied published parts read; original interview incompleteKnuth recounts military missile stories heard from a professor and a relative, qualifies the camera assumption in a FLIR calculation, and describes sonar data he says he received from an unnamed operator. The original records are absent and some remembered numbers conflict. Nongovernment research invitations, natural-orb possibilities and perceptual explanations remain distinct from evidence of classified access.
Supplied automatic transcript readA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach