Pasulka reports intelligence-agency interest and a scientist’s invitation to an alleged site. She distinguishes scientists’ convictions from established reality and raises the possibility that her research was being used.
Both supplied published parts read; original interview incompleteLoeb reports initiating a conversation with Avril Haines, a call with Grusch that supplied no supporting evidence, and a tentative reply from an unnamed former Lockheed employee. He also describes Kirkpatrick’s contrary position and says he cannot decide whether the government has anything. Public speaking invitations, reported conversations and suggestions about corporate custody are distinguished from programme access.
Complete supplied official transcript read; original audio unverifiedA curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach