Results

InterviewS7569

Shawn Ryan Show - #96 Col. John Alexander - Military Applications of the Paranormal

Shawn Ryan, John B. Alexander. podscripts.co. February 12, 2024.

Alexander recounts invitations, military briefings, INSCOM contracts and private NIDS contacts, while describing an unfunded self-initiated UFO group. He reports refused funding, failed and uncontrolled demonstrations, unanswered outreach and senior officials’ denials. Firsthand claimed conversations are separated from relayed encounters and later inference. The supplied third-party transcript is complete; original media and supporting records remain unverified.

Complete supplied third-party transcript read; original AV unverified
InterviewS7528

Scientists Need to Study UAP — Kevin Knuth, Lehto Files

Kevin Knuth, Chris Lehto. iheart.com. August 27, 2026.

Knuth recounts military missile stories heard from a professor and a relative, qualifies the camera assumption in a FLIR calculation, and describes sonar data he says he received from an unnamed operator. The original records are absent and some remembered numbers conflict. Nongovernment research invitations, natural-orb possibilities and perceptual explanations remain distinct from evidence of classified access.

Supplied automatic transcript read
InterviewS7628

Our Second Open-Ended Conversation — Lyn Buchanan / Jeffrey Mishlove, published dialogue

Lyn Buchanan, Jeffrey Mishlove. nonlocalmind.org. 2023.

Buchanan recounts military remote-viewing work, unnamed corporate and space-related work, an archive request and claimed access to a conventional classified rocket-test area. He says retirement leaves him unaware whether the military programme continues. Remote-viewing interpretations, planned travel and generic private approaches are retained as his accounts, with recipients and records unresolved. Swann is discussed as a methodology source.

Complete bounded publisher dialogue and qualified page layouts; original AV gaps

A curated public selection. Source review describes what was read; it does not establish that a claim is true. Our research approach